What are the legal grounds for contesting an administrative act

What are the legal grounds for contesting an administrative act

In Romania, people and businesses can challenge decisions made by government bodies.

The Law on Administrative Disputes sets the rules for this.

It helps protect your rights if you think a decision was unfair.

Knowing how to contest an administrative act is key.

It helps keep public actions legal and fair.

This way, you can defend your rights effectively.

legal grounds administrative act Romania

Key Takeaways

  • The Law on Administrative Disputes in Romania allows for the judicial review of administrative acts to protect citizens’ rights and ensure the legality of public administration activities.
  • Individuals and legal entities can initiate administrative proceedings if they believe an administrative act has violated their rights or direct personal interests.
  • Contesting administrative acts is a crucial mechanism for holding public authorities accountable and ensuring the legality of their decisions.
  • The legal grounds for challenging administrative acts in Romania include lack of competence, procedural violations, and violation of substantive law.
  • Seeking legal assistance from specialized administrative lawyers can help navigate the complexities of administrative litigation and increase the chances of success.

Understanding Administrative Acts and Their Legal Framework

In Romania, the rules for administrative acts come from the Law on Administrative Disputes and the Administrative Code.

These laws help us understand what administrative law is and how it works in the country.

Definition and Scope of Administrative Acts

Administrative acts are decisions made by public bodies that impact people’s rights or duties.

They can be orders, decisions, permits, or licenses.

Romania’s legal system has two types: normative acts that set rules and individual acts that solve specific problems.

Key Elements of Administrative Law in Romania

  • Principle of Legality: Public bodies must follow the law and stay within their legal powers.
  • Principle of Proportionality: Decisions should match the goal they aim for, balancing public and individual interests.
  • Right to Legal Protection: People and groups can challenge decisions in court or through other legal means.

Role of Public Authorities in Administrative Decisions

Public bodies like ministries and local governments are key in making administrative acts.

They must follow legal steps and act fairly, ensuring transparency and respect for the law.

Their actions can be reviewed in court to make sure they follow the law and protect everyone’s rights.

administrative law romania

 

Legal Grounds Administrative Act Romania

In Romania, the rules for challenging an administrative act are based on constitutional rightsdue process, and the rule of law.

These acts are the main way public authorities act.

They can be contested on several important grounds.

One reason to challenge an administrative act is if it breaks the law or doesn’t follow the right procedures.

This could happen if the wrong authority makes the act or if the facts are wrong.

The Administrative Court of Romania can decide if an act is legal. If not, they can cancel or change it.

People can also challenge acts made by higher authorities.

This gives them a chance to fight government actions that go against their rights or due process.

Key FactsData
Administrative acts as the main legal form of public administrationAdministrative acts are the main legal form of the activity of public administration authorities.
Building permits as individual administrative actsA building permit is an individual administrative act that produces legal effects as envisaged by the issuing public authority.
Administrative operations vs. administrative actsAdministrative operations (notices, agreements, minutes of establishment) are necessary steps for issuing administrative acts but do not produce legal effects themselves.
Court cases mentioning the exception of illegalityIn the last years (for ex. January 2016 – October 2021), there have been 985 court cases where the exception of illegality was mentioned in Romania.
Areas where the exception of illegality is raisedThe predominant matters where the exception of illegality is raised are urban planning procedures and administrative-fiscal procedures according to the findings from the website www.Rolii.ro.

Knowing how to challenge administrative acts in Romania helps protect rights and ensures fairness.

It allows people to stand up against government actions that don’t follow the law.

administrative law romania

Fundamental Principles of Administrative Dispute Resolution

In Romania, the way we handle disputes with the government is based on key principles.

These ensure everyone’s rights are protected and government decisions are fair.

The main principles are the rule of law, proportionality, and the right to legal defense.

Principle of Legality

The rule of law means all actions by government must follow the law.

This makes sure government decisions are based on solid legal ground.

It also ensures these decisions don’t go beyond what the law allows.

Principle of Proportionality

The principle of proportionality says government actions must match their goals.

These actions should not unfairly restrict people’s rights.

Any limits must be justified and needed to serve a public interest.

Right to Legal Protection

The right to legal protection lets people challenge unfair government decisions in court.

This gives citizens a fair chance to have their say against government actions.

It protects against decisions that are not lawful or fair.

By following these principles, Romania’s dispute resolution process aims to balance government and individual rights.

It promotes transparency, accountability, and the rule of law.

PrincipleDescription
LegalityAdministrative acts must comply with relevant laws and regulations.
ProportionalityAdministrative actions should not excessively limit individual rights.
Right to Legal ProtectionIndividuals can contest unfavorable administrative decisions in courts.

Procedural Requirements for Contesting Administrative Acts

Challenging administrative acts in Romania has specific steps to follow.

These steps are outlined in the laws about administrative actions.

They make sure the process is fair and open.

To challenge an administrative act, you must file a complaint on time.

The Law on Administrative Disputes (No. 554/2004) sets these deadlines.

Missing these deadlines can mean your case is dismissed.

You also need to include all the documents that support your claim.

This might be copies of the act you’re challenging, proof of harm, and other important papers.

It’s key to follow these rules to make your case valid.

When you submit your complaint, you must do it the right way.

This could mean sending it directly to the Administrative Court or following other steps set by the authorities.

Usually, you must try to solve the issue through administrative channels first.

This means appealing the decision through the right channels before going to court.

But, there are exceptions based on the law.

  1. File a complaint within the statutory deadlines set by the Law on Administrative Disputes (No. 554/2004)
  2. Provide the necessary documentation to support your claim, including copies of the contested administrative act and evidence of harm or violation
  3. Follow the proper submission protocols for contesting administrative acts, which may involve direct filing with the Administrative Court or additional procedures
  4. Exhaust administrative remedies before seeking judicial review, unless exceptions apply under the law

Following these steps ensures your challenge is handled correctly.

It respects the legal framework and rules of administrative proceedings in Romania.

Time Limits and Filing Procedures

Understanding time limits and filing procedures is key when dealing with administrative acts in Romania.

These rules are vital for challenging decisions fairly and efficiently.

They help make sure the judicial review process works well.

Statutory Deadlines for Filing Complaints

In Romania, you usually have 30 days to contest an administrative act after you’re notified.

Public prosecutors get 60 days.

Remember, these deadlines can’t be changed by anyone involved.

Documentation Requirements

To challenge an administrative act, you need a few things.

These include the decision you’re contesting, any evidence that supports your claim, and a power of attorney if you’re represented.

It’s important to gather and submit all these documents correctly.

Submission Protocols

You can file a complaint against an administrative act with the right court.

You can do this in person, by mail, or even by recording it at the court.

This makes it easier for people to seek judicial review administrative acts and legality administrative decisions.

Understanding how to challenge administrative acts in Romania is complex.

You need to know the time limits, what documents are needed, and how to submit them.

Following these rules helps individuals and groups exercise their rights and get the judicial review they need.

Rights and Obligations of Parties in Administrative Disputes

In Romania, those in administrative disputes have clear rights and duties.

These rules help make sure the process is fair and open.

If you’re challenging an administrative act, you can speak up, see the case files, and share evidence.

Public authorities must give out important documents and explain their decisions.

This makes sure public actions are clear and fair. Also, others who really care about the outcome can join the case.

Rights of PartiesObligations of Parties
  • Right to be heard
  • Access to case files
  • Right to present evidence
  • Provide relevant documents
  • Justify administrative decisions
  • Participate if direct interest is established

These rules help keep the dispute resolution process fair and balanced.

They follow the public administration law in Romania.

Grounds for Administrative Act Contestation

In Romania, there are many reasons to contest administrative acts.

These include lack of authority, breaking rules, and not following the law.

These reasons help keep the government in check and protect people’s rights.

They make sure the government’s actions can be reviewed in court.

Lack of Competence

One reason to contest an act is if the wrong person made it.

This happens when someone without the right to do so issues a decision.

Or, if the person who signed it didn’t have the power to do so.

Procedural Violations

Another reason is if the act was made without following the proper steps.

This includes not giving enough notice, not consulting the public, or not getting the facts right.

Violation of Substantive Law

Acts can also be challenged if they go against the law or are too broad.

This includes if they contradict higher laws or don’t follow important principles like the right to be heard.

These grounds for contestation are key in Romanian law.

They let citizens review government decisions in court.

This helps keep the government accountable and protects people’s rights.

It’s important for a fair and effective administrative system.

Role of Administrative Courts

In Romania, administrative courts are key in keeping the law and ensuring fair process in government actions.

They can check if government decisions are legal. If not, they can cancel these decisions, ask for new ones, or give money to those affected.

Their rulings are final and must be followed, showing how important they are.

The Supreme Court of Romania can also look at these decisions, adding more checks and balances.

These courts protect people and businesses from government mistakes or unfair actions.

Working with the People’s Advocate, they make sure everyone follows the law and gets a fair hearing.

FAQ

What are the legal grounds for contesting an administrative act in Romania?

In Romania, you can challenge an administrative act if it breaks the law or the rules of procedure.

You can also contest it if the authority that made it wasn’t supposed to. Or if the facts were not correctly established.

What is the legal framework for administrative acts in Romania?

Romania’s laws for administrative acts are based on the Law on Administrative Disputes and the Administrative Code.

These laws ensure acts are legal, fair, and protect citizens’ rights. Public bodies must follow these rules when making decisions.

What are the fundamental principles of administrative dispute resolution in Romania?

In Romania, resolving administrative disputes follows three main principles.

First, acts must follow the law.

Second, actions should be fair and not overly limit rights.

Third, everyone has the right to go to court if they disagree with a decision.

What are the procedural requirements for contesting administrative acts in Romania?

To challenge an administrative act in Romania, you must follow certain steps.

You need to file your complaint within a set time, provide all necessary documents, and follow the right steps.

The Administrative Court of Romania handles these disputes, and you must try to solve the issue first before going to court.

What are the time limits and filing procedures for contesting administrative acts in Romania?

You have 30 days to challenge an administrative act in Romania after you’re told about it.

Public prosecutors have 60 days.

You’ll need to include the act you’re challenging, evidence, and a power of attorney if you have a lawyer in Romania.

You can file your complaint in person, by mail, or by recording it at the court.

What are the rights and obligations of parties in administrative disputes in Romania?

In administrative disputes in Romania, both sides have rights and duties.

You have the right to be heard and to see your case files.

Authorities must give you the documents you need and explain their decisions.

Other people can join the case if they have a direct interest in it.

On what grounds can administrative acts be contested in Romania?

You can challenge an administrative act in Romania for several reasons.

If the authority that made it wasn’t allowed to, if there were mistakes in the process, or if the act goes against the law.

These are the main reasons.

What is the role of administrative courts in Romania?

Administrative courts in Romania are key in checking if administrative acts are legal.

They can cancel acts that are not lawful, ask authorities to make new ones, or give damages.

Their decisions are final, and the Supreme Court can review them if there’s a legal issue.

What is an administrative act under Romanian law?

An administrative act in Romania is a legal document issued by a public authority that creates, modifies, or terminates legal rights and obligations.

These acts are subject to administrative law and can be contested if they violate an individual’s rights or interests.

Romanian law provides specific grounds for challenging such acts, ensuring that public authorities operate within the bounds of legality and respect citizens’ rights.

What are the main legal grounds for contesting an administrative act in Romania?

The primary legal grounds for contesting an administrative act in Romania include:

1. Lack of competence of the issuing authority

2. Violation of legal procedures in adopting the act

3. Breach of substantive law

4. Abuse of power

5. Violation of the principle of proportionality

6. Failure to state reasons or insufficient reasoning

7. Illegality of the act’s content

8. Infringement of fundamental rights and freedoms.

These grounds are established by Romanian law and case law, and can be invoked when seeking to appeal an administrative act.

How can I contest a tax decision in Romania?

To contest a tax decision in Romania, you should follow these steps:

1. Review the decision carefully to identify potential grounds for contestation

2. File a written appeal with the tax authority that issued the decision within 45 days.

How can I file a complaint against a public authority in Romania

How can I file a complaint against a public authority in Romania

As a citizen, you have the right to hold public authorities accountable.

This includes dealing with administrative injustice, bureaucratic inefficiency, or unfair treatment.

Romania has established ways to address your grievances.

But, do you know how to file a complaint against a government entity?

Understanding the administrative complaint system can be challenging.

However, with the right information, you can make sure your voice is heard.

Your concerns will be addressed properly.

complaint public authority in Romania

Key Takeaways

  • Romania has robust administrative complaint mechanisms to enforce consumer rights and protect citizens from public sector misconduct.
  • The National Authority for Consumer Protection (NACP) is the primary enforcement body for consumer-related grievances against businesses and government agencies.
  • Complaints can be filed by consumers, organizations, and even competitors, and the NACP can launch investigations ex officio.
  • Complaint submission methods include written, electronic, and in-person filing at NACP territorial offices.
  • The People’s Advocate (Ombudsman) institution also plays a crucial role in resolving administrative disputes and protecting citizens’ rights.

Understanding Romanian Administrative Complaint Systems

Romania’s system for handling complaints involves many public bodies.

The National Authority for Consumer Protection (NACP) leads in consumer issues.

Other important groups include the National Authority for Administration and Regulation in Communications, the Ministry of Regional Development and Tourism, and the Ministry of Public Finance.

Key Public Authorities and Their Jurisdictions

The system is guided by laws and EU directives.

These rules define what each authority does.

They handle everything from consumer rights to unfair business practices.

Legal Framework for Administrative Complaints

The judiciary is key in solving complaints.

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, Courts of Appeal, and county tribunals deal with disputes.

They make sure complaints are resolved fairly.

Types of Administrative Violations

Romania deals with many types of violations.

These include consumer protection, public procurement, urban planning, and taxes.

The National Council for Solving Complaints (N.C.S.C.) focuses on public procurement, ensuring laws are followed.

Romanian administrative complaint system

The Romanian system is complex, with many agencies and courts working together.

Knowing the laws and roles of each authority helps in resolving issues.

Filing a Complaint Public Authority in Romania: Step-by-Step Process

As a Romanian citizen, you have the right to hold your government accountable.

You can seek redress for any administrative grievances.

The process of filing a complaint against a public authority in Romania involves several steps.

These steps are designed to ensure government transparency and protect your rights as a citizen.

  1. Attempt to Resolve the Issue Directly: Before escalating your complaint, try to resolve the matter directly with the public authority or professional in question. This can often lead to a quicker and more amicable resolution.
  2. File a Complaint with the Relevant Authority: If the direct approach is unsuccessful, you can file a formal complaint with the National Authority for Consumer Protection (NACP) or the specific public authority involved.
  3. Complete the Complaint Form: For NACP complaints, you will need to fill out an online or in-person form. This form should include details about the product or service, the identity of the economic operator, and any relevant supporting documents, such as invoices, contracts, or guarantee certificates.
  4. Submit Supporting Documentation: Ensure that you provide all necessary documentation to substantiate your complaint, such as invoices, contracts, or any other evidence that supports your case.
  5. Monitor the Investigation Process: The public authority or NACP will investigate your complaint and provide a response within the legally prescribed timeframe. Stay informed about the progress of your case and be prepared to provide additional information or evidence if required.

By following this step-by-step process, you can effectively exercise your citizen rights in Romania.

You contribute to improving government accountability and transparency in the delivery of public services.

The Role of the National Authority for Consumer Protection (NACP)

In Romania, the National Authority for Consumer Protection (NACP) is key in protecting consumer rights.

It investigates complaints and ensures traders follow the law.

The NACP can start investigations, ask for evidence, and fine traders to keep the market fair.

NACP’s Enforcement Powers

The NACP has strong powers to enforce the law.

It can look at documents, ask for information, do site visits, and even make test buys.

These actions help the NACP keep an eye on the market and stop unfair practices.

How to Submit Complaints to NACP

There are several ways to file a complaint with the NACP in Romania.

You can write a letter, use the NACP website, or visit an office in person.

The NACP must look into complaints within 30 days, sometimes up to 45 days for harder cases.

Processing Times and Procedures

The NACP works fast to solve complaints.

It aims to finish investigating within 30 days, with extra time for complex issues.

his quick action helps keep the market fair and ensures consumer rights are respected.

NACP complaint processing

Complaint Submission MethodProcessing Time
Written Complaint30 days (with a 15-day extension for complex cases)
Electronic Complaint (via NACP website)30 days (with a 15-day extension for complex cases)
In-Person Complaint (at NACP territorial offices)30 days (with a 15-day extension for complex cases)

People’s Advocate Institution (Romanian Ombudsman)

The People’s Advocate Institution is the Romanian Ombudsman.

It plays a key role in keeping public services high and transparent.

It also protects those who speak out against wrongdoings.

This independent group can talk to public officials, change or cancel their decisions, fix problems, and help those who have been wronged. They can also start investigations, give advice, and tell the Government or Parliament about bad acts.

They can keep their work public but can also keep some things secret if asked.

This helps protect those who speak out and keeps corruption at bay.

Started in 1991, the People’s Advocate Institution is a big help for citizens’ rights and freedoms.

The Ombudsman is chosen by the Parliament for five years.

They report back every year or when asked, keeping things open and honest.

The team has experts in many areas, like women’s rights, minority rights, and children’s rights.

They also deal with police, property, work issues, and taxes.

This wide range of focus helps them protect everyone’s rights and freedoms.

The People’s Advocate Institution is strong because it can stand up for citizens’ rights.

It can even take cases to the Constitutional Court and other high courts.

This makes sure public officials are held accountable.

Documentation Requirements and Evidence Submission

When you file a complaint against a public authority in Romania, you need to provide detailed documents and evidence.

This helps ensure your case is well looked into.

It also protects your rights as a citizen, following the rules of participatory democracy and government oversight.

Essential Documents Needed

You’ll need to gather invoices, contracts, and guarantee certificates.

These papers prove your claims and show how your rights have been affected.

They are key to getting transparency and protection.

Supporting Evidence Guidelines

  • Make sure all documents and evidence clearly show the details of your complaint.
  • Keep your materials organized and easy to follow. This helps authorities review your case quickly.
  • Be ready to give more information or clarify points if asked. This ensures your rights are fully protected.

Digital Submission Requirements

For online submissions to the National Authority for Consumer Protection (NACP), you must fill out a specific form.

You also need to attach at least one document.

Not providing the needed information or submitting incomplete documents can lead to fines and delays.

This hinders efforts for public sector accountability.

Document TypeAcceptable FormatsMaximum File Size
Invoices, Contracts, Guarantee CertificatesPDF, JPG, PNG5 MB per file
Additional Supporting EvidencePDF, JPG, PNG, DOC, DOCX10 MB per file

By carefully preparing your documents and evidence, you show your dedication to government oversight.

This strengthens your case for resolving issues through the right channels in Romania.

Administrative Complaint Investigation Process

In Romania, the National Supervisory Authority for Personal Data Processing (ANSPDCP) handles complaints.

This agency looks into issues with personal data processing under the General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679.

To file a complaint, you need to write it down in Romanian or English.

You should include your name, surname, address, and email.

You can send it online, by mail, or through ANSPDCP’s website.

Your complaint should explain the problem, what you’ve done so far, and any evidence you have.

But if ANSPDCP thinks your complaint is not valid or too much, they might ask for money or ignore it.

ANSPDCP must tell you about their findings within three months.

If they need more time, they’ll keep you updated every three months until they’re done.

StatisticValue
Ratio of complaints filed by victims versus complaints filed by witnessesN/A
Percentage of complaints relating to domestic violence filed by persons with management positions within public administration authorities or public institutionsN/A
Average time taken to submit a prior complaintN/A
Proportion of complaints submitted in written form versus verballyN/A
Number of complaints withdrawn before issuing a final judgmentN/A
Frequency of electronic complaints received with certified electronic signaturesN/A
Distribution of offenses punishable upon prior complaint based on legal categoriesN/A
Rate of complaints submitted by legal entities versus individualsN/A

The investigation might lead to recommendations or referrals to courts.

The People’s Advocate can also investigate, ask for information, and take depositions.

Legal Timeframes and Authority Response Obligations

Filing complaints against public authorities in Romania has its rules.

It’s important to know the legal timeframes and how authorities must respond.

This ensures transparency and accountability in the process.

Statutory Response Periods

Authorities in Romania must reply to complaints within 30 days. Sometimes, they might need up to 15 more days.

This helps keep the ombudsman office and public sector transparency strong, supporting regulatory compliance and civic engagement.

Appeal Windows and Deadlines

If a complaint isn’t solved, the People’s Advocate can help.

They give authorities 30 days to fix any problems.

If it’s still not fixed, higher authorities have 45 days to act.

The Government has 20 days to respond to the People’s Advocate’s findings.

Knowing these rules is key for those dealing with public sector transparency and regulatory compliance in Romania.

It helps citizens hold authorities accountable and participate in civic engagement.

Alternative Methods of Administrative Redress

In Romania, there are many ways for citizens to solve problems with public services.

These options help address issues like slow services and lack of transparency.

They offer more than just the usual complaint systems.

One way is to file complaints with special agencies. For example, the National Authority for Administration and Regulation in Communications or the Ministry of Public Finance.

These groups can look into and fix problems in their areas.

For issues with getting public information, you can complain to the top people at the public authority.

If it doesn’t get fixed, you can take it to court.

Alternative Redress MethodResponsible AuthorityComplaint Procedure
Sector-specific Regulatory ComplaintsNational Authority for Administration and Regulation in Communications, Ministry of Public FinanceFile complaint directly with the specific regulatory body overseeing the sector
Public Information Access ViolationsLeadership of the relevant public authorityFile complaint directly with the public authority; if unresolved, escalate to the nearest law court

These options give Romanian citizens more ways to solve problems with public services.

By using special agencies and the courts, people can fight for their rights.

This helps make public services better, reduces delays, and increases transparency.

Conclusion

Romania has a system for citizens to complain about public services.

You can file detailed complaints with the right bodies.

You need to support your claims with evidence and follow certain time limits.

The National Authority for Consumer Protection (NACP) and the People’s Advocate Institution (the Romanian Ombudsman) help with these complaints.

They work to solve issues with public services and bureaucratic problems.

It’s important to know the rules and steps of the complaint system.

By learning about it, you can make sure your concerns are heard.

This includes filing complaints with the NACP or the Romanian Ombudsman.

Remember, the success of the Ombudsman depends on its ability to adapt and meet social needs.

It also relies on its moral authority to fix administrative issues.

The complaint system in Romania is strong. It helps citizens hold public authorities responsible and solve problems.

By using the right channels and providing the right documents, you can help improve public services and support good governance in Romania.

The Romanian administrative complaint system offers citizens multiple avenues for defending their rights against public authorities.
From filing detailed complaints with the competent authorities, supported by concrete evidence, to respecting legal deadlines, the process is well-defined and structured.
Key authorities such as the National Authority for Consumer Protection (ANPC) and the People’s Advocate Institution (Romanian Ombudsman) play an essential role in resolving complaints and addressing issues related to public services and bureaucracy.
Knowing the rules and steps of the complaint system is crucial for citizens to ensure that their concerns are heard and addressed.
However, the complexity of the administrative complaint system can be daunting for ordinary citizens.
From identifying the competent authority to correctly formulating the complaint and gathering the necessary evidence, the process can be cumbersome and time-consuming.
In such situations, the assistance of a Romanian lawyer specializing in administrative law can be extremely beneficial.
A lawyer in Romania or a Romanian law office with experience in this field can offer:
Personalized legal advice: The lawyer can analyze the client’s specific situation, identify the best course of action, and offer advice on formulating the complaint and gathering evidence.
Legal representation: The lawyer can represent the client before the competent authorities, ensuring that their rights are respected and that their arguments are presented clearly and convincingly.
Negotiation and mediation: In some cases, a lawyer can facilitate an amicable resolution of the conflict through negotiation and mediation with the public authority involved.
By using the services of a Romanian lawyer, citizens can navigate more easily through the complexity of the administrative complaint system and increase their chances of obtaining a favorable outcome.

FAQ

What are the key public authorities involved in the administrative complaint system in Romania?

The main authorities include the National Authority for Consumer Protection (NACP), the National Authority for Administration and Regulation in Communications, the Ministry of Regional Development and Tourism, and the Ministry of Public Finance.

What is the legal framework for filing administrative complaints in Romania?

The legal framework is based on various Government Emergency Ordinances and Laws implementing EU Directives on consumer rights and protection.

What types of administrative violations can be addressed through the complaint system?

Administrative violations can range from consumer rights infringements to unfair commercial practices.

How do I file a complaint with the National Authority for Consumer Protection (NACP)?

First, try to solve the issue directly with the trader.

If that fails, use the NACP’s online form or visit a local office.

You’ll need to attach documents like invoices and contracts.

What are the powers and responsibilities of the People’s Advocate Institution (Romanian Ombudsman)?

The People’s Advocate Institution can help fix problems with public services.

They can ask for changes or help restore what was lost.

They also make recommendations and report illegal acts to the Government or Parliament.

What type of documentation and evidence is required when filing an administrative complaint in Romania?

You’ll need invoices, contracts, and guarantee certificates.

Traders must show proof of their claims.

For online submissions, use a specific form and attach a document.

How does the administrative complaint investigation process work in Romania?

The process starts with the authority checking your complaint and evidence.

They might ask for more info.

The People’s Advocate can also investigate and make recommendations.

What are the legal timeframes and response obligations for public authorities in Romania?

Authorities must reply within 30 days, sometimes with a 15-day extension.

The People’s Advocate has 30 days to act. If problems persist, higher authorities have 45 days to respond.

The Government must address illegal acts within 20 days.

Are there any alternative methods of administrative redress in Romania?

Yes, you can also file complaints with sector-specific authorities.

For public information issues, contact the relevant authority’s leadership.

If not resolved, you can go to court.