Contract Review in Romania: 12 Clauses to Check
Which contract clauses should a business check before signing?
A Romanian business contract should clearly allocate performance, payment, liability, intellectual-property, data and exit risks. These 12 clauses are the practical starting point for a legal and commercial review.
Contract review in Romania should test more than whether an agreement is formally valid. Before signing, a business should understand what it must deliver, when it will be paid, which losses it may bear, how intellectual property and data may be used, and how the relationship can end.
Commercial contracts are often negotiated under pressure. A supplier is ready to begin, a customer wants the final draft immediately, or a foreign group needs its Romanian operation running without delay. That is precisely when unclear wording, inconsistent annexes and borrowed template clauses are most likely to pass unnoticed. Companies entering the market should connect the contract with the wider steps required to start and operate a business in Romania.
Under the Romanian Civil Code, a validly concluded contract is binding on the parties, and contractual negotiations and performance are governed by good faith. A useful review therefore connects the legal wording with the operational deal. It identifies which party controls each risk, whether the agreed remedy can work in practice, and what evidence will be needed if performance is disputed.
The following 12 clauses form a practical checklist for Romanian companies and foreign businesses entering agreements governed by Romanian law or involving a Romanian counterparty.
Parties, capacity and signing authority
The contract should identify the correct legal entities, not merely the brand names used in negotiations. For a Romanian company, check its registered name, registered office, Trade Registry number, fiscal identification code and representative. If a group is involved, establish which entity receives the services, issues invoices, owns the relevant assets and assumes liability.
Signing authority should be verified against the company’s constitutional documents, Trade Registry information, corporate approvals or a power of attorney. A signature block describing someone as a “manager” does not itself resolve whether that person may bind the company for the relevant transaction. The representation rules should be checked against the company’s current Romanian articles of incorporation and the registered powers of its administrators.
The internal authority analysis also matters for potential Romanian company director liability, particularly where a director signs outside approved limits or fails to document a material commercial decision.
Scope, deliverables and acceptance
The scope clause should describe the goods or services, specifications, quantities, locations, deadlines, dependencies and exclusions. For project work, it should also establish milestones, acceptance tests, correction periods and a change-control procedure.
Review the main agreement together with proposals, statements of work, order forms and technical annexes. If they conflict, an order-of-precedence clause should determine which document controls. Acceptance by silence should also be tested carefully: specify when the review period begins, what constitutes a valid rejection and what happens when defects are minor. Providers using standard customer documentation should also verify the applicable service contract requirements in Romania.
Price, VAT, invoicing and payment
A complete payment clause states the price or calculation method, currency, VAT treatment, invoicing trigger, payment deadline, supporting documents, bank charges and the procedure for disputing an invoice. It should also explain whether the customer may withhold, deduct or set off amounts and whether the supplier may suspend performance for non-payment.
For B2B transactions, Law no. 72/2013 on late payment contains mandatory protections. Article 5(1) establishes a general 60-calendar-day limit for contractual payment terms between professionals. By exception, the parties may agree a longer payment term, provided that the clause is not abusive under Article 12. A term exceeding 60 days is therefore not automatically invalid, but it should be assessed carefully for gross unfairness to the creditor in light of the statutory criteria and the circumstances of the transaction. Where the applicable conditions are met, late payment can trigger statutory penalty interest and the fixed EUR 40 recovery compensation.
For the calculation rules and available remedies, see our guide to late-payment interest and penalties in Romania.
Term, renewal and minimum commitments
The agreement should state its effective date, initial duration and whether it renews automatically. An automatic renewal clause is not necessarily problematic, but the notice window, notice method and effect of a missed deadline must be clear.
Check minimum purchase commitments, exclusivity, take-or-pay obligations and price changes that continue into a renewal term. Add internal calendar reminders for any deadline that determines whether the company remains bound for another year or loses a renegotiation opportunity.
Termination, cure periods and exit assistance
The termination clause should distinguish between serious breach, remediable breach, insolvency-related events, prolonged force majeure and termination for convenience. It should specify whether prior notice is required, how long the defaulting party has to cure, and whether termination operates through a contractual mechanism or requires another legal step.
The Romanian Civil Code regulates remedies for non-performance, including termination under Article 1549 and the related provisions. The contract should not merely say that a party “may terminate immediately”. It should align the grounds, notice mechanics and agreed effects with the type of contract and the intended remedy.
Exit provisions matter just as much as the termination trigger. Address final invoices, transition assistance, return of equipment and documents, data export, deletion, continued licences and the clauses that survive termination.
Penalty clauses and late-payment interest
A penalty clause fixes in advance the consequence of non-performance, defective performance or delay. Under Article 1538 of the Romanian Civil Code, its drafting should identify the protected obligation, the triggering event and the calculation method. The agreement should also state whether a penalty is daily or fixed, whether it is capped and how it interacts with damages and other remedies.
Article 1541 permits a court to reduce a penalty in the statutory circumstances, including where it is manifestly excessive in relation to the loss that the parties could have foreseen when concluding the contract. A high percentage is therefore not a substitute for careful drafting.
Liability caps, exclusions and indemnities
Liability provisions should allocate risk in proportion to the contract’s value, the parties’ control and the available insurance. Review the general cap, any separate or higher caps, excluded categories of loss, claims procedures and responsibility for employees, affiliates and subcontractors.
Do not assume that an indemnity is a familiar standard clause. It should identify the covered events, third-party claims, control of the defence, settlement authority, notification duties and mitigation. Check whether the limitation of liability applies to the indemnity or whether it creates uncapped exposure.
Any exclusion or limitation must also be tested against mandatory law and the nature of the conduct involved. A clause should not be described as protecting a party against every possible form of unlawful conduct. Where the agreement supports a wider investment or group operation, the liability wording should be reviewed together with the company’s corporate and commercial governance arrangements.
Warranties, regulatory compliance and audit rights
Warranties should be specific to the transaction. Depending on the contract, they may cover conformity with specifications, professional licences, legal compliance, authority, sanctions, anti-bribery, tax status, employment practices, product safety or the absence of third-party rights.
The review should also establish the remedy for an inaccurate warranty. Possible outcomes include correction, replacement, a price adjustment, indemnification or termination. An audit right should define scope, frequency, confidentiality, cost allocation and the treatment of identified non-compliance.
Force majeure, hardship and change in law
Force majeure and hardship solve different problems. Force majeure concerns an external, unforeseeable, absolutely invincible and unavoidable event under the Civil Code framework. Hardship under Article 1271 addresses an exceptional change that makes performance excessively onerous, subject to the statutory conditions and the allocation of contractual risk.
The clause should define notice, evidence, mitigation, suspension, continued payment obligations and the point at which prolonged disruption permits termination. For regulated or long-term projects, add a change-in-law mechanism explaining who bears new compliance costs and whether price or timing may be adjusted.
Confidentiality and intellectual property
A confidentiality clause should define protected information, permitted use, internal access, legally required disclosures, security standards, duration and return or destruction. Trade-secret protection also depends on practical steps, so access controls and marking procedures should match the contractual wording. A standalone non-disclosure agreement in Romania may be appropriate before sensitive negotiations begin.
For intellectual property, distinguish pre-existing materials from deliverables created under the contract. State whether rights are assigned or licensed and address territory, duration, field of use, sublicensing, modifications, source materials and third-party components.
Romanian Law no. 8/1996 on copyright requires an assignment of economic copyright to specify the transferred rights and, for each, the modes of use, duration, extent and remuneration. A generic sentence stating that the customer “owns everything” may therefore be insufficient for the intended result. Businesses acquiring or licensing valuable assets can obtain a separate review from intellectual property lawyers in Romania.
For ownership arrangements between founders and shareholders, see our guide to shareholder agreements in Romania.
Personal data, security and digital services
If the agreement involves personal data, identify whether each party acts as controller, processor, joint controller or independent controller. When a supplier processes personal data on behalf of a controller, Article 28 of the General Data Protection Regulation requires a contract containing specified safeguards. Our GDPR compliance checklist for Romanian companies explains the wider governance controls that should support those clauses.
Review processing instructions, confidentiality, security measures, subprocessors, assistance with data-subject requests, breach notification, international transfers, audit rights and return or deletion. The commercial agreement and data processing agreement should not contain inconsistent liability, notice or termination rules. More complex vendor arrangements may require assistance from GDPR and data protection lawyers in Romania.
For SaaS and other digital services, also check availability commitments, backups, recovery objectives, vulnerability management, incident cooperation, data portability and access after termination. Technology businesses should align these provisions with their wider technology and digital law obligations and, where relevant, obtain a focused IT and software contract review.
Governing law, jurisdiction and notices
In cross-border contracts, governing law and forum are separate questions. The Rome I Regulation generally allows the parties to choose the law governing their contractual obligations, subject to its safeguards and mandatory rules. The Brussels I bis Regulation governs jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in relevant EU civil and commercial matters.
Consider whether the selected court or arbitral tribunal is proportionate to the likely dispute, where evidence and assets are located, the language and cost of proceedings, and whether an eventual judgment or award can be enforced efficiently.
The notice clause should identify valid addresses, permitted delivery methods, deemed receipt and the process for updating contact details. A termination or claim notice sent to the commercial contact may fail if the contract requires delivery to a different address or by a specific method. Where non-payment is already a concern, the agreement should be tested against the available legal recovery options for unpaid invoices in Romania.
Contract review in Romania: risk map
| Contract area | Question to answer | Risk if unclear |
|---|---|---|
| Authority | Is the correct entity bound by an authorised person? | Enforceability, approval and group-liability disputes. |
| Performance | What exactly must be delivered, tested and accepted? | Disputes over completion, defects and payment. |
| Payment | When is money due and what follows from delay? | Cash-flow loss, penalties and invoice disputes. |
| Exit | How can the relationship end and what survives? | Lock-in, service interruption and lost data. |
| Liability | Which losses are covered, capped or excluded? | Exposure disproportionate to contract value. |
| IP and data | Who owns or may use assets, information and data? | Loss of rights, GDPR exposure and operational dependency. |
| Disputes | Which law, forum and notice rules apply? | Unexpected cost and difficult enforcement. |
A practical pre-signing review process
Need a Romanian contract reviewed before signing?
Atrium Romanian Lawyers assists Romanian and foreign businesses with contract review, drafting and negotiation. The review can be delivered as tracked changes, replacement clauses, a consolidated draft or a practical risk report adapted to your position in the transaction.
Frequently asked questions
Is a business contract written in English valid in Romania?
Romanian companies can generally conclude commercial contracts in English. The transaction may nevertheless require Romanian-language documents or translations for authorities, courts, employees, consumers, notaries or regulated formalities. The governing-language clause should state which version prevails if the contract is bilingual.
Can a foreign-law contract be used with a Romanian company?
Potentially, yes. In a cross-border contract, the parties may often choose the governing law, but the Rome I framework, mandatory rules, the place of performance and the practical enforcement route must be considered. Choosing foreign law does not automatically remove every Romanian mandatory provision relevant to the transaction.
Are contractual penalties enforceable in Romania?
Romanian law recognises penalty clauses, but the obligation, trigger and calculation must be clear. Article 1541 of the Civil Code permits judicial reduction in the statutory circumstances, including a penalty that is manifestly excessive compared with the foreseeable loss at contract formation.
When should contract review in Romania take place?
Ideally before signing and before the commercial position becomes difficult to change. A new review is also appropriate before renewal, when the scope or price changes, when a party proposes an amendment, or when performance problems and a possible dispute emerge.
What should a foreign company send to the reviewing lawyer?
Send the complete draft and annexes, the commercial proposal, your role in the transaction, the applicable deadline, the principal business concerns and any terms already agreed. Identifying whether you are the customer, supplier, licensor, employer, investor or distributor changes the risk analysis.
Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information and does not constitute legal, tax or commercial advice. Contractual rights and risks depend on the complete document, the transaction, the parties, mandatory rules and the relevant facts.
AI Notice: AI-assisted content, reviewed and approved by a qualified Romanian lawyer.
