Bucharest business district illustrating a share purchase agreement in Romania

Share Purchase Agreement in Romania: Due Diligence, Warranties and Closing Risks

A share purchase agreement in Romania should do more than record the number of shares and the price. It must connect the buyer’s due diligence findings with the conditions for closing, the seller’s warranties, specific indemnities, price mechanics and the corporate and regulatory steps needed to transfer control safely.

In brief: In a Romanian share deal, the buyer acquires the company with its assets, contracts, employees, licences, debts and historical exposure. The SPA therefore allocates risk between buyer and seller. Due diligence identifies the issues; the contract decides whether they must be corrected before closing, reflected in the price, disclosed against warranties, covered by an indemnity or accepted by the buyer. Romanian corporate approvals, ANAF formalities, merger control and investment screening must be tested early because they can change the signing and closing timetable.

This guide is written for foreign investors, international groups, founders and business owners negotiating the acquisition or sale of a Romanian company. It focuses on private acquisitions of shares or social parts, particularly Romanian limited liability companies (SRLs). Listed-company rules, regulated-sector acquisitions, privatisations and public takeovers require additional analysis.

The article complements our procedural guide to changing shareholders in a Romanian company. That guide covers the Trade Register implementation. This one explains how the commercial acquisition should be investigated, negotiated and protected contractually.

What does a share purchase agreement do in Romania?

A share purchase agreement, commonly called an SPA, is the principal contract under which the seller agrees to transfer and the buyer agrees to acquire shares or social parts in a Romanian company. It identifies the securities, price, conditions, closing process and allocation of risk between the parties.

The agreement operates within Romanian contract law and the mandatory rules applicable to the target’s corporate form. For an SRL, the transfer mechanics must be aligned with Articles 202 and 203 of Company Law no. 31/1990 and the applicable registration formalities before the National Trade Register Office (ONRC).

Deal structure
What does the buyer actually acquire?

Select a route to see how the risk profile changes.

Share deal

The buyer acquires the target entity itself. Contracts and assets generally remain with that entity, but so do its historical liabilities and compliance exposure.

Decision pointShare dealAsset deal
What transfersOwnership of the target company.Identified assets, contracts, liabilities or business components.
Historic liabilitiesRemain inside the acquired company and therefore affect the buyer economically.Generally remain with the seller unless assumed by contract or transferred by law.
Contracts and permitsUsually remain with the same legal entity, subject to change-of-control clauses and regulatory rules.May require individual assignment, consent, novation or reissuance.
EmployeesRemain employed by the target.A business transfer may trigger employee-transfer rules and information or consultation duties.
Core documentShare purchase agreement.Business or asset transfer agreement plus asset-specific instruments.

Why must legal due diligence come before the SPA is finalised?

Due diligence should identify the matters that can change the decision to buy, the valuation, the deal timetable or the contractual protection. A report that merely lists documents does not complete the task. Each material finding should be converted into a transaction response.

Share purchase agreement Romania due diligence represented by a green maze with a clear route
Legal due diligence helps the buyer identify risks and determine the appropriate route to a protected transaction. AI-generated illustration.

The scope normally covers corporate title and governance, financing and security, material contracts, real estate, employment, tax, disputes, permits, regulatory compliance, intellectual property, IT, data protection, environmental matters and beneficial ownership. Sector, size and business model determine the emphasis.

Due diligence map
Convert each finding into a deal response

Select a finding to see the appropriate contractual response.

Remediation

Require the seller or target to correct a curable defect before closing and deliver objective evidence that the correction is complete.

WorkstreamKey questionsPossible SPA response
Corporate and titleDoes the seller own the shares? Do the articles of association create pre-emption rights, and are there pledges, options, capital defects or approval restrictions?Title warranty, release condition, shareholder waiver, completion deliverable.
Material contractsDo customers, lenders or suppliers have termination, consent or change-of-control rights?Consent condition, covenant, retention or price adjustment.
EmploymentAre remuneration, dismissals, contractors, collective arrangements and key-person dependencies compliant?Remediation, employment warranty, specific indemnity, retention plan.
TaxAre filings complete? Are there audits, arrears, related-party risks or unsupported tax treatments?Tax covenant, tax warranty, escrow, special indemnity.
IP, technology and dataDoes the target own or validly license critical IP? Are cybersecurity and GDPR controls adequate?Assignment, licence cure, warranty, remediation plan, indemnity.
Disputes and regulationAre there claims, investigations, licences, sanctions, environmental or sector-specific risks?Regulatory condition, conduct covenant, indemnity or exclusion from the deal.

Which clauses matter most in a Romanian share purchase agreement?

The SPA should describe the transaction as one coherent mechanism. Definitions, price, conditions, warranties, disclosure, indemnities, limitations, covenants and closing deliverables must work together. Imported English-law wording should not be used without checking how it operates under the chosen governing law and Romanian mandatory rules.

Clause navigator
How does each protection work?

Select a clause family to see its transaction function.

Warranties

Contractual statements about the target, shares and business. Their value depends on scope, disclosure, knowledge qualifiers, repetition, claim rules and available recovery.

ProtectionPrincipal functionDrafting question
WarrantyAllocates risk if a contractual statement about the target or business is inaccurate.What is warranted, when is it true, and how do disclosure and seller knowledge qualify it?
Specific indemnityAllocates a defined known or identified exposure.What event triggers payment, which losses are covered and do general limitations apply?
Condition precedentPrevents closing until a necessary event, consent or approval occurs.Who controls satisfaction, what evidence is required, and when may either party terminate?
Pre-closing covenantControls how the target operates between signing and closing.Which actions need buyer consent without giving the buyer unlawful premature control?
Limitation regimeSets time limits, thresholds, caps, exclusions and claim procedure.Which claims are carved out, and does the recovery structure match the seller’s credit risk?

How should the purchase price be structured?

The price clause should explain both the headline value and the route from that value to the amount paid. A fixed price is not necessarily simple if debt, cash, working capital, leakage, earn-outs, holdbacks or currency conversion remain unresolved.

MechanismHow it worksMain negotiation risk
Locked-boxPrice is based on historic accounts at an agreed date, protected by a no-leakage covenant.Reliability of the accounts, leakage definition and permitted payments.
Completion accountsPrice adjusts after closing by reference to closing debt, cash, working capital or other metrics.Accounting policies, hierarchy of rules, timetable and expert determination.
Earn-outPart of the consideration depends on future performance or milestones.Control of the business, metric manipulation, extraordinary items and information rights.
Escrow or holdbackPart of the price is retained or deposited to support identified obligations or claims.Release triggers, duration, permitted deductions and insolvency protection.

A buyer should not treat escrow as a substitute for a coherent claims regime. The SPA should state whether recovery is limited to the escrow, whether the buyer may set off, how competing claims are handled and what happens when the escrow expires.

What is the difference between signing and closing?

Signing creates the contractual commitment. Closing completes the agreed transfer and payment once the applicable conditions are satisfied or waived. They may occur on the same day in a simple transaction, but regulatory approvals, third-party consents, financing or restructuring often require a split process.

Transaction roadmap
From exclusivity to effective control

Select a stage to review the principal legal control.

Term sheet

Align structure, valuation, exclusivity, confidentiality, process and principal conditions before the parties spend heavily on diligence and drafting.

Which Romanian approvals and filings can affect closing?

The regulatory analysis should begin before the SPA timetable is agreed. A condition drafted after signing cannot restore leverage or time already lost.

Corporate approval and ONRC registration

For an SRL transfer to an outside buyer, Article 202 of Company Law no. 31/1990 applies together with the target’s articles of association. The parties should verify statutory approval thresholds and any pre-emption or consent rights created by the articles of association, as well as pledges and other restrictions. The applicable ONRC registration formalities and the update of the company’s shareholder register should be built into the completion process.

ANAF notification and tax-debt safeguards

The practical scope of Article V of Law no. 239/2025, as amended by Government Emergency Ordinance no. 13/2026, should be verified in light of the transaction structure and current ONRC and ANAF practice. Although the regime was introduced in the context of transfers affecting company control, registration practice during 2026 has raised questions regarding its application to a broader range of SRL share transfers, as discussed in this analysis of emerging ONRC practice. The parties should confirm the current notification, tax-certificate, guarantee and registration requirements before signing and again before filing.

Merger control

An acquisition of sole or joint control may constitute an economic concentration. Under Competition Law no. 21/1996, the Romanian thresholds are generally met where the combined worldwide turnover of the undertakings concerned exceeds EUR 10 million and at least two undertakings concerned each achieved Romanian turnover exceeding EUR 4 million in the previous financial year. The EU Merger Regulation may apply instead where its thresholds are met. Closing before the required clearance can expose the parties to gun-jumping risk.

Investment screening

Romania’s investment-screening regime under Government Emergency Ordinance no. 46/2022 was substantially amended by Government Emergency Ordinance no. 17/2026. The general value threshold is now EUR 5 million, but a transaction below the threshold may still be examined if it may affect security, public order or EU projects or programmes. The rules can apply to EU and non-EU investors, and the filing contribution is EUR 5,000 where an authorisation application is required. Sector, investor, control, value and transaction structure must be screened early.

Sector approvals, lender consents, foreign-subsidy review or contractual change-of-control notices may also be relevant. The SPA should allocate responsibility, information, cooperation, remedies and the long-stop date for each approval.

What should happen at closing?

Closing should be a coordinated exchange, not a loose collection of signatures. The SPA should identify every deliverable, who provides it, its agreed form and whether all actions are deemed simultaneous.

  1. Confirm conditions. Record satisfaction or valid waiver of every closing condition.
  2. Approve the transfer. Deliver the required shareholder and corporate resolutions.
  3. Transfer the shares. Execute the required instruments and update the shareholder register.
  4. Pay the consideration. Follow the funds flow, escrow and debt repayment arrangements.
  5. Release security. Deliver releases of share pledges, guarantees or target security where agreed.
  6. Change governance. Coordinate resignations, appointments, powers of attorney and bank mandates.
  7. Deliver control items. Transfer corporate books, credentials, keys, seals and agreed records.
  8. Complete filings. Submit ONRC and ANAF documents, together with beneficial-owner filings where required under the applicable transparency rules, within the relevant timetable.

What limitations should apply to seller liability?

Seller limitations often include a de minimis threshold, basket, aggregate cap, time limits, mitigation, exclusion of double recovery and a formal claim procedure. Tax, title, authority, fraud and specific indemnities may have different limits. The commercial result depends on how these provisions interact, not on any one headline cap.

The buyer should also test recoverability. A contractual claim against a seller with no accessible assets may provide little protection. Escrow, holdback, bank security, parent guarantee or warranty and indemnity insurance may be considered depending on transaction size and risk.

A buyer’s pre-signing checklist

  1. Define the acquisition perimeter. Confirm percentage, target entities, securities and excluded items.
  2. Verify title and authority. Check ownership, encumbrances, approvals and signatory powers.
  3. Complete risk-focused due diligence. Prioritise issues that affect value, continuity or closing.
  4. Translate findings into protections. Allocate each material issue to remediation, price, condition, warranty, indemnity or withdrawal.
  5. Select the price mechanism. Define accounting rules, leakage, debt, cash, working capital and dispute resolution.
  6. Screen regulatory approvals. Review merger control, investment screening, sector approvals and third-party consents.
  7. Align signing and closing. Specify conditions, conduct rules, long-stop date, termination and closing deliverables.
  8. Test recovery. Check caps, time limits, exclusions, seller credit and available security.
  9. Plan filings and integration. Prepare ONRC and ANAF filings, beneficial-owner filings where required under the applicable transparency rules, governance steps and day-one actions.

The bottom line

A Romanian SPA should be the final expression of the buyer’s investigation and the parties’ negotiated risk allocation. The strongest agreement is not the longest. It is the one that identifies what is being bought, states how price is calculated, prevents closing before essential approvals, allocates known and unknown risks clearly and gives the parties an executable closing process.

Planning the acquisition or sale of a Romanian company?

A focused transaction review can cover deal structure, legal due diligence, SPA negotiation, regulatory screening, signing, closing and Romanian corporate implementation.

Book a Consultation

Frequently asked questions

Is a share purchase agreement mandatory in Romania?

A written transfer instrument is normally required to document and implement the transaction. In a negotiated acquisition, the SPA is the central agreement because it also records price mechanics, conditions, warranties, indemnities and closing. The required form and supporting corporate documents depend on the target’s legal form and transaction structure.

What is the difference between an SPA and a shareholders’ agreement?

The SPA governs the acquisition of shares and the allocation of transaction risk between buyer and seller. A shareholders’ agreement governs the continuing relationship among shareholders after the investment, including governance, reserved matters, funding, transfers, deadlock and exit. A minority investment may require both documents.

Can signing and closing occur on the same day?

Yes, where no unsatisfied conditions or approvals require a split process. If merger control, investment screening, financing, third-party consent or pre-closing remediation is required, signing normally precedes closing and the SPA must regulate the interim period and long-stop date.

Does due diligence remove the need for warranties?

No. Due diligence and warranties serve different functions. Diligence helps the buyer identify and evaluate risk. Warranties allocate contractual risk for inaccurate statements, subject to disclosure and limitations. Known issues may require remediation, a price adjustment or a specific indemnity rather than reliance on a general warranty.

When is Romanian investment-screening approval required?

The analysis depends on the investor, target activity, transaction structure, control or durable participation, sensitive sector and investment value. The general threshold is EUR 5 million after OUG no. 17/2026, but lower-value transactions may still be examined where security, public-order or relevant EU interests may be affected.

What happens after the SPA closes?

The parties must complete the agreed corporate, Trade Register and ANAF steps, as well as beneficial-owner filings where required under the applicable transparency rules. They must also release or retain escrow as applicable, implement governance changes and perform post-closing covenants. Price-adjustment, earn-out, indemnity and integration obligations may continue long after legal ownership changes.

Disclaimer: This article provides general information and does not constitute legal or tax advice. The correct structure, approvals, tax treatment and contractual protections depend on the parties, target, sector and facts of each transaction.

AI Notice: AI-assisted content, reviewed and approved by a qualified Romanian lawyer.

Corporate buildings connected by a glass bridge, symbolising solutions to shareholder deadlock in Romania

Shareholder Deadlock in Romania: Exit and Remedies

Corporate governance · Romania

Shareholder Deadlock in Romania: Exit and Remedies

A shareholder deadlock can stop budgets, appointments, financing, contracts and an eventual sale. This guide explains how Romanian shareholders and foreign investors can define the deadlock, preserve ordinary operations, escalate the dispute and use a negotiated or statutory exit route.

The correct response depends on the company type, articles of association, shareholder agreement, voting structure, conduct and remedy sought. The current version of Law no. 31/1990 and the company’s documents should be checked before action.

In short: equal ownership does not automatically mean that a Romanian company is deadlocked. The practical problem arises when a required decision cannot be validly adopted and the failure materially affects the company. The safest response is usually a staged mechanism: define the blocked decision, protect essential operations, escalate, attempt an appropriate form of resolution and preserve any court or exit remedy.

What happens when Romanian shareholders can no longer make decisions?

A deadlock is a governance problem before it becomes a lawsuit. The company may be unable to approve a budget, appoint a manager, authorise financing, sign a material contract or decide whether to sell. The first task is to identify the exact decision that is blocked and the rule that prevents it from being adopted.

A disagreement about strategy is not automatically a legal deadlock. The issue becomes more serious when the required majority, unanimity or joint-signature rule cannot be reached, the dispute continues after a properly convened meeting and the company’s operations are materially affected. A minority investor with a veto may create the same practical risk as two 50/50 shareholders.

Decision blocked

Identify the resolution, voting threshold, quorum, notice and evidence of the failed decision.

Business exposed

Protect payroll, taxes, essential suppliers, insurance, records and ordinary-course activity while the dispute is addressed.

Exit required

Use escalation, mediation, expert determination, buy-sell, transfer, withdrawal or dissolution only where the facts support it.

Important: a shareholder should not assume that stopping all company activity creates negotiating leverage. Directors and administrators still have duties to the company, and emergency or compliance decisions may need to continue.

How should a shareholder diagnose the deadlock?

The diagnosis should compare four documents and four realities: the articles of association, any shareholders’ agreement, the mandates and signing authorities, and the company’s actual governance practice. A private agreement may create obligations between shareholders, but it does not automatically replace the constitutional rules that operate through the company.

Select the point that determines the next governance decision.

Define the blockage

Record the decision that failed, the meeting notice, votes cast, applicable threshold and the operational consequence for the company.

Diagnostic questionWhat to reviewWhy it mattersImmediate control
What decision is blocked?Agenda, minutes, written refusals, voting record and company impact.Separates a material deadlock from an ordinary disagreement.Send a written notice identifying the decision and the consequence.
Which rule applies?Articles, shareholder agreement, Law no. 31/1990 and signing mandates.A private veto may not operate like a statutory voting rule.Map the legal effect of the rule before threatening a remedy.
Can ordinary activity continue?Last approved budget, administrator powers, bank instructions and compliance deadlines.Prevents the dispute from unnecessarily damaging the business.Define essential expenditure and information access while escalation runs.
What is the desired outcome?Continuation, buyout, sale, mediation, court remedy or dissolution.Different outcomes require different documents, evidence and timetables.Select a route proportionate to value, urgency and relationship.

Why must the shareholders’ agreement match the articles of association?

A shareholders’ agreement is normally a private contract between its parties. The articles of association are the company’s constitutional document and contain rules that function through the corporate structure. If the agreement promises a veto but the articles allow the resolution to pass by a lower majority, a shareholder may have a contractual claim without being able to stop the corporate resolution.

For a Romanian SRL, Article 192 of Law no. 31/1990 provides default rules on the majority required for decisions, subject to the statutory framework and the articles. Article 193 addresses voting through social parts. Where capital parity prevents an absolute majority from being established, Article 7(d¹) should be considered when drafting the method for adopting general-meeting resolutions with the participation and vote of all shareholders.

The documents should be coordinated on quorum, notice, voting thresholds, administrator powers, joint-signature rules, reserved matters, transfer restrictions and the treatment of a failed vote. The agreement can contain confidential commercial mechanics, but the corporate rules needed to operate the company should be reflected in the articles and, where required, in registered information.

Articles

Set the constitutional voting and governance rules that operate through the Romanian company.

Shareholder agreement

Add private obligations, escalation steps, information rights, valuation and exit mechanics.

Mandates

Make sure administrator powers and signing authorities do not contradict the agreed decision structure.

How should reserved matters and veto rights be drafted?

Reserved matters protect investors from fundamental changes, but an excessive list can turn normal management into permanent negotiation. Each matter should have a clear financial or strategic threshold, an approval level, a decision-maker and a timetable. The drafting should distinguish shareholder matters from administrator or management matters.

The agreement should state whether consent may be withheld freely or only for specified reasons. It should also explain what happens when a meeting fails, when information is missing, when one shareholder does not attend and when the same proposal is rejected more than once. Silence should not accidentally authorise a major transaction, but it should not paralyse routine activity either.

ClausePurposeDrafting controlDeadlock consequence
Deadlock definitionIdentifies when the process begins.Use material matters, repeated failed votes and written notice.Starts the agreed escalation timetable.
EscalationMoves the issue beyond the original negotiators.Name decision-makers, documents and realistic deadlines.Creates a final internal opportunity to resolve the issue.
Interim operationsKeeps the company functioning.Continue the last approved budget and essential compliance activity.Limits value destruction while the dispute continues.
Buy-sell mechanismAllows one shareholder to acquire the other’s interest.Define price, funding evidence, completion and default.Creates a controlled exit instead of indefinite blockage.
Final remedyEnds an unresolved dispute.Coordinate contractual sequence with statutory rights.Use court dissolution only as a genuine last resort.

What escalation process should come first?

A workable process usually begins with a written deadlock notice. The notice should identify the decision, the failed vote, the relevant documents, the operational risk and the proposed date for a second meeting. It should avoid inflammatory language and should preserve the shareholder’s position without treating every negotiation statement as an admission.

The next stage may involve senior representatives of the shareholder groups who were not involved in daily management. Mediation can help where the dispute concerns valuation, business strategy or loss of trust. Expert determination is more suitable for a discrete accounting, technical or valuation question. The agreement should define the scope of each process and the effect of the decision.

A cooling-off period may be useful, but it should not be so long that it allows statutory challenge periods, financing deadlines or insolvency risks to expire. Information rights, confidentiality and interim access to company records should remain clear throughout the process.

Select the preferred outcome to see the main control.

Continue together

Restore decision-making with a documented escalation, revised mandates, clearer reserved matters and an agreed interim operating plan.

How can the company operate during the deadlock?

A deadlock clause should not become a licence to stop salaries, taxes, insurance, essential supplies or compliance filings. The parties should identify what can continue under the last approved budget and what requires a fresh shareholder decision. Emergency expenditure should be narrowly defined and documented.

Shareholders should preserve access to accounts, records and management information. Neither party should divert customers, employees, intellectual property or corporate opportunities while the exit process is pending. A director or administrator must continue to act within the duties owed to the company. A shareholder instruction does not legalise conduct that breaches mandatory law or harms the company.

The practical protocol should cover bank access, payment approvals, payroll, tax filings, customer communication, data security, insurance, licences and the retention of corporate records. If the company has two administrators who must sign jointly, the parties should check whether that arrangement itself is causing the standstill and whether a lawful adjustment is possible.

Which buy-sell mechanisms can resolve a deadlock?

A buy-sell mechanism can produce a clean exit, but labels such as “Russian roulette” or “Texas shoot-out” are not enough. The clause must explain who may start the process, whether the initiating shareholder offers to buy or sell, how a price is determined and what happens if the other party cannot complete.

These mechanisms may disadvantage a shareholder with less access to financing. Safeguards can include evidence of funds, a minimum price, independent valuation, a reasonable completion period and restrictions on using confidential company information to finance the acquisition. The agreement should address shareholder loans, guarantees, accrued dividends, management positions, releases and the transfer of company property or intellectual property.

For an SRL, transfer restrictions must also be reviewed under Law no. 31/1990 and the articles. Transfers between existing shareholders and transfers to an outsider may be subject to different approval rules. The transfer should be coordinated with the shareholders’ register, the Trade Register filing and any update to beneficial-owner information or regulatory analysis required by the transaction.

What legal remedies exist when there is no workable clause?

The available remedy depends on the company type, the conduct and the relief sought. A shareholder may challenge an unlawful corporate resolution under the applicable company-law rules, but strict procedural periods can apply. The shareholder should preserve the minutes, notices, voting record, documents and evidence of the company’s operational impact before negotiations are allowed to drift.

For an SRL, Article 226 of Law no. 31/1990 may permit withdrawal in the cases stated in the articles, with the agreement of the other shareholders or, where agreement is absent, for serious grounds established by the tribunal. The value of the withdrawing shareholder’s rights may require agreement, expert work or court determination.

Exclusion is not a general cure for deadlock. Article 222 contains specific statutory situations and should not be treated as a broad remedy for an unpleasant or uncooperative shareholder. A company cannot simply exclude a shareholder because negotiations have failed.

Judicial dissolution under Article 227(1)(e) may be available for serious reasons, including grave disagreements that prevent the company from functioning. Dissolution destroys the going-concern investment and may reduce value, so it should normally remain the last remedy after contractual and commercial solutions have been assessed. It is not a substitute for drafting a workable exit clause.

Should a deadlock dispute go to court or arbitration?

Arbitration may offer confidentiality, specialist decision-makers and procedural flexibility, especially in a cross-border investment. The clause must identify the institution or ad hoc rules, seat, language, number of arbitrators and governing law. It should also address urgent relief, interim measures and the relationship with the company and other transaction documents.

Not every corporate issue can be solved only between the contracting shareholders. Some resolutions, registrations or remedies affect the company and require statutory procedures or Trade Register steps. A dispute clause should distinguish contractual claims from company-law remedies and ensure that the company is bound where that is legally possible and commercially intended.

Before filing, compare the value of the investment, the urgency, the evidence, the effect on the business, the available interim relief and the likelihood that a judgment or award can be implemented. Litigation or arbitration can resolve a legal question, but it may not restore the commercial relationship. A negotiated buyout can sometimes preserve more value than a technically successful dissolution claim.

Pre-signing shareholder deadlock checklist

  • Identify decisions that require shareholder approval, administrator approval or joint signatures.
  • Define deadlock by reference to material matters, repeated failed votes and written notice.
  • Coordinate the articles of association, shareholders’ agreement, mandates and registered information.
  • Set realistic escalation steps and name the people who must participate.
  • Protect ordinary-course operations, payroll, taxes, insurance, records and essential contracts.
  • Choose mediation, expert determination or a buy-sell process for the type of dispute it can actually resolve.
  • Define valuation date, methodology, adjustments, discounts, expert appointment and cost allocation.
  • Address transfer restrictions, pre-emption, tag-along, drag-along and Trade Register formalities.
  • Require funding evidence and completion documents for any buyout mechanism.
  • Preserve statutory challenge periods and do not let negotiation remove the right to seek urgent relief.

Frequently asked questions

Is a 50/50 Romanian company automatically deadlocked?

No. Equal ownership creates structural risk, but deadlock exists only when a required decision cannot be adopted and the failure materially affects the company. The articles and shareholder agreement should address parity, governance and exit mechanics.

Can one shareholder force the other to sell?

Only if a valid contractual or statutory mechanism permits it and its conditions are satisfied. A buy-sell clause must address price, funding, completion, transfer formalities and default consequences.

Can a shareholder be excluded simply for causing deadlock?

Not automatically. Exclusion is governed by specific statutory situations and cannot be used as a general remedy merely because the shareholders disagree or negotiations have failed.

Can a shareholder withdraw from a Romanian SRL?

Withdrawal may be available under Article 226 of Law no. 31/1990 in the cases stated in the articles, with the required agreement or, in the absence of agreement, for serious grounds established by the tribunal.

Can shareholder deadlock lead to dissolution?

Yes, judicial dissolution may be available for serious reasons, including grave disagreements that prevent the company from functioning. It is a last-resort remedy because it may destroy going-concern value.

Should the deadlock clause appear in both documents?

Critical voting, governance and registered transfer rules should be coordinated with the articles of association and mandates. Private commercial details may remain in the shareholders’ agreement, subject to enforceability and confidentiality analysis.

Need a Romanian deadlock clause or exit strategy?

A focused review can align the articles, shareholder agreement, voting structure, interim protections, valuation process and available remedies.

Book a consultation

Disclaimer: This article provides general information only and does not constitute legal advice or the creation of a lawyer-client relationship. The correct approach depends on the company type, constitutional documents, shareholder agreement, facts, evidence and remedies sought. Obtain a case-specific assessment before taking corporate or litigation steps.

AI Notice: AI-assisted content, reviewed by a qualified Romanian lawyer.