Employment due diligence in Romania for a business acquisition

Employment Due Diligence in Romania: A Buyer’s Legal Checklist

Employment law • M&A • Romania

Employment due diligence in Romania helps a buyer understand the people, contracts, payroll obligations and workforce risks it may inherit with a target company. The review should connect employment documents with the transaction structure, valuation, warranties, indemnities and post-closing integration plan.

The scope and consequences of employment due diligence differ significantly between share acquisitions and asset transactions. In a share acquisition, the employing company normally remains the same legal entity, while an asset or business transfer may require a separate analysis of whether employees and employment-related rights transfer with the relevant undertaking.

What is employment due diligence in a Romanian transaction?

Employment due diligence is a transaction-focused review of the target’s workforce and employment liabilities. It is not the same as a general HR audit. The buyer needs to know which risks affect price, continuity, retention, integration and the contractual protection package.

The scope may include employees, directors, consultants, independent contractors, temporary workers, secondees, expatriates and other individuals providing services to the target. The legal analysis typically depends on the actual working relationship and not solely on the contractual label used by the parties.

Romanian employment due diligence is primarily assessed under Law No. 53/2003, the Romanian Labour Code, together with the special legislation applicable to matters such as transfers of undertakings, collective relations, occupational health and safety, employee data and the employment of foreign nationals.

This guide is distinct from general Romanian employment law advice, disciplinary dismissal guidance and the separate review of employees versus independent contractors. Its focus is the buyer’s decision before, during and after an acquisition.

Buyer’s Review Map

Interactive review map

Select an employment area

Click or tap a card to see the first documents and questions to request.

Workforce structure

Request a headcount by entity, role, location and employment status. Identify employees, directors, contractors, temporary workers, secondees and key individuals whose departure could affect the business.

Employment Due Diligence Risk Scanner

Interactive risk screen

Select the signals that apply

This is a preliminary review signal, not an automated legal opinion. Select the statements that describe the target. The result helps identify where the data room needs deeper review.

Preliminary result: select the statements that apply to see the suggested diligence response.

What does Romanian employment due diligence examine?

The central test is whether the target’s written documents, payroll records and actual employment practice tell the same story. A signed contract may not reveal unpaid overtime, informal benefits, misclassification, inconsistent termination practice or undocumented management arrangements.

The buyer should identify the employing entity, workplace, reporting line and practical role for each material category of worker. It should then compare that information with employment contracts, amendments, payroll, internal policies, time records, leave records and communications where relevant. Gaps are not necessarily breaches, but they are signals that require explanation and proportionate follow-up.

The review should also distinguish liabilities that remain with the seller from risks that will affect the buyer after completion. This is especially important where the buyer intends to reorganise the workforce, harmonise benefits, move employees between group entities or change managers shortly after closing.

Share deals, asset deals and transfers of undertakings

In a share acquisition, the target company remains the employer and its employment contracts generally continue within the same legal entity. The buyer nevertheless needs to review change-of-control provisions, transaction bonuses, retention arrangements, employee communications and any post-closing measures that could require consultation, consent or amendments.

In asset transactions or business transfers, buyers should assess whether Articles 173–174 of the Romanian Labour Code and Law No. 67/2006 on safeguarding employees’ rights in transfers of undertakings apply to the transfer of an undertaking, unit or part of one. Where the legal requirements for a transfer of undertaking are met, employment contracts and related rights and obligations may transfer automatically to the transferee together with the relevant business unit. Information and, where measures affecting employees are envisaged, consultation obligations may also arise.

Not every asset purchase constitutes a transfer of undertaking. The analysis is fact-specific and should examine the business activity, assets, workforce, organisation and continuity of the relevant economic unit. The transaction timetable should allow the parties to identify the affected employees, collective rights, accrued liabilities and mandatory information or consultation steps before completion.

Employment contracts and actual working practice

Romanian employment contracts should be reviewed for role, place of work, working time, salary, benefits, probation, confidentiality, intellectual property, mobility and termination-related terms. The review should not stop at the template. Amendments, side letters, emails, payroll records and established practice may create additional obligations or evidence.

For contractors and consultants, the buyer should test the factual relationship. Control, integration, exclusivity, personal performance, economic dependence and the way work is organised may matter more than the title of the agreement. Romanian tax authorities, labour inspectors and courts may examine the factual circumstances of the relationship irrespective of contractual labels. A contractor issue may create employment, tax and social-security exposure and should be assessed with the relevant accounting and tax workstreams.

Payroll, benefits and hidden employment liabilities

Payroll due diligence should reconcile employment terms with salary payments, bonuses, commissions, overtime, holiday pay, sick leave, meal or mobility benefits, expense policies and any retention or equity arrangements. The question is not only whether a payment was made, but whether the target has recorded and treated the payment consistently.

Potential liabilities may arise from unpaid entitlements, informal benefits, inaccurate working-time records, delayed payments, incorrect deductions or practices applied differently to comparable employees. The buyer should request explanations for material inconsistencies and determine whether they require quantification, remediation or a specific transaction protection.

Key employees deserve separate attention. A transaction may affect retention, reporting lines, incentives, confidentiality, non-compete obligations, intellectual-property arrangements and the continuity of client or technical relationships. The SPA and integration plan should identify which people are material to the investment case and what can realistically be done to retain them.

Where restrictive covenants are material to the investment, the buyer should verify their scope, enforceability, duration and, where applicable, compliance with the requirements governing post-termination non-compete obligations under Romanian law.

In technology-focused transactions, the buyer should verify the allocation of intellectual-property rights created by employees, contractors and management personnel. Employment contracts, contractor agreements, confidentiality undertakings and IP assignment documents should be reviewed together with the factual development process and the rights required to operate or commercialise the target’s products.

Dismissals, claims and protected employees

Termination risk should be reviewed through the underlying facts and procedure, not only through the existence of a signed dismissal decision. Request information on disciplinary investigations, performance procedures, redundancies, settlement arrangements, grievances, threatened claims, court files, labour-inspection requests and communications with employees or representatives.

The buyer should identify whether a claim may affect more than the individual claimant. A repeated payroll practice, a group-wide working-time issue or a pattern of termination decisions may create a wider exposure than the disclosed dispute suggests. Protected categories, leave-related rights and employee representation may also affect the timing and defensibility of a proposed post-closing change.

The review should cover collective labour agreements, collective-bargaining procedures, trade unions and employee representatives, including compliance with applicable information and consultation obligations. The target’s arrangements should be checked against Law No. 367/2022 on social dialogue, as subsequently amended, and against any sectoral or company-level collective terms that may apply.

Occupational health and safety and ITM history

Employment due diligence should also review occupational health and safety compliance under Law No. 319/2006. The data room should address work accidents, occupational diseases, mandatory training records, risk assessments, prevention measures and the organisation of occupational-health and safety responsibilities.

The buyer should request details of Labour Inspectorate (ITM) inspections, findings, sanctions and pending compliance measures. A recurring failure, incomplete risk assessment or serious accident may require specialist investigation, quantified remediation and specific transaction protection rather than reliance on a general employment warranty.

Data protection, monitoring and employee information

Employment due diligence often involves personal data about employees, candidates, managers and claimants. The buyer should establish what information is requested, who can access it, how it is shared in the data room and whether the target has a lawful and documented process for the disclosure.

The substantive review may include employee monitoring, access logs, CCTV, productivity tools, recruitment platforms, health information, international transfers, retention and security. Sensitive information should be minimised and appropriately protected. During preliminary stages, the parties should minimise employee-identifying information and consider anonymisation, aggregation, redaction or controlled clean-room procedures where appropriate. The transaction team should coordinate the employment review with the GDPR workstream rather than copy entire personnel files into a data room by default.

Where employee monitoring through electronic communications, access logs, productivity tools or video surveillance is involved, the review should assess compliance with the GDPR and Article 5 of Law No. 190/2018. Relevant issues may include necessity and proportionality, transparency, prior consultation with employee representatives, retention periods and whether a data-protection impact assessment is required.

Non-EU personnel, work authorisations and residence rights

For non-EU personnel, the review should assess compliance with Emergency Ordinance No. 32/2026 on access of foreign nationals to the Romanian labour market and Emergency Ordinance No. 194/2002 on the status of foreign nationals. Depending on the workforce and the applicable regime, the review may cover the employer’s registration or authorisation position, employment authorisations, residence rights, changes of employer or role, secondments and applicable reporting obligations.

What should the buyer request?

Interactive document checklist

Select a review area

Click or tap a numbered card to see the documents and checks relevant to that workstream.

Workforce data

Obtain headcount, roles, locations, employment status, start dates, salary bands and key-person information.

Employment risks and SPA protection

Select a row to highlight the transaction takeaway.

Employment due diligence matrix
Review areaWhat the buyer checksPossible transaction response
Who works for the target and whether the contractual labels match the factual relationship.Workforce warranty, remediation plan or specific protection for classification exposure.
Whether an asset or business transfer meets Articles 173–174 of the Labour Code and Law No. 67/2006, and which employees, rights and consultation steps are affected.Transfer plan, employee information or consultation process, liability allocation and closing timetable.
Salary, bonus, benefits, equity, expenses, payroll practice and unpaid entitlements.Disclosure, price adjustment, warranty or indemnity for quantified liabilities.
Terminations, disciplinary processes, protected employees, claims and authority investigations.Specific indemnity, closing condition, litigation reserve or post-closing conduct protocol.
Collective bargaining, employee representatives, trade unions, risk assessments, work accidents and ITM history.Specialist review, remediation covenant, specific warranty or indemnity for identified exposure.
Retention, management continuity, confidentiality, non-compete and ownership of employee or contractor-created IP.Retention arrangements, IP confirmations, transition covenant or targeted warranty.
Employee-data processing, monitoring, access, transfers, retention, security and compliance with the GDPR and Law No. 190/2018.Privacy remediation, updated notices, DPIA assessment or integration workstream.
Employer status, employment authorisations, residence rights, secondments and cross-border assignments under the current immigration framework.Condition precedent, authorisation or renewal plan, warranty or continuity arrangement.

Due Diligence Timeline

Transaction sequence

What should happen at each stage?

Before signing

Agree the scope, confidentiality controls, data-room categories and responsible contacts. Prioritise risks that could affect valuation, continuity or the timetable.

Bottom line for the buyer

Employment due diligence should end with a decision, not a document pile. For each material issue, the buyer should know the factual position, likely exposure, responsible owner, timing and contractual or operational response.

A practical report may classify findings as matters to accept, investigate, remediate before closing, disclose, protect through the SPA or manage through post-closing integration. That structure allows the buyer to negotiate from evidence and prevents employment risks from disappearing inside a generic compliance warranty.

Employment Due Diligence in Practice

Anonymised client matter. The following summary describes the type of employment due-diligence issues addressed in a transaction handled by Atrium Romanian Lawyers. Certain details have been anonymised and simplified to protect client confidentiality.

Employment review for the acquisition of a Romanian technology and business-services company

A foreign investor considered the acquisition of a Romanian technology and business-services company with a workforce operating across multiple locations. As part of the transaction, the buyer requested a workforce inventory, employment agreements, payroll records, contractor documentation, internal policies and information relating to ongoing employment disputes.

The review identified several matters requiring further analysis. Workforce records were not fully consolidated, certain contractors performed functions comparable to those carried out by employees, and some compensation practices appeared in payroll data without being consistently reflected in the underlying contractual documentation. The review also identified retention considerations affecting key personnel involved in the operational continuity of the business.

Issues identified

Workforce records, contractor classification, compensation documentation and key-person retention.

Atrium’s role

Document review, employment-risk assessment and coordination with the wider transaction team.

Transaction response

Targeted disclosures, contractual protection, document remediation and post-closing integration measures.

Atrium Romanian Lawyers coordinated the employment due-diligence workstream, reviewed the available documentation and prepared a risk-based assessment of the identified matters. Our team worked with the wider transaction team to prioritise the findings according to their potential legal, financial and operational impact.

The findings were translated into practical transaction recommendations, including targeted disclosures, specific contractual protections, pre-closing document remediation and post-closing integration measures.

The transaction documentation was updated to address the employment matters identified during the review. A structured plan was also prepared for addressing priority employment issues following completion.

This matter has been anonymised and simplified for publication. The appropriate legal analysis and transaction protections depend on the specific facts, documents, transaction structure and commercial objectives of each matter.

How Atrium Romanian Lawyers can assist

Atrium Romanian Lawyers can coordinate an employment due-diligence workstream for a Romanian acquisition, investment or corporate reorganisation. The review can cover workforce structure, contracts, payroll, working time, terminations, disputes, contractors, GDPR, permits, key employees and the translation of findings into transaction documents.

Frequently asked questions

Is employment due diligence necessary for every acquisition?

The scope should be proportionate to the target’s workforce, sector, transaction structure and known risk. A business with a large workforce, regulated operations, key employees or employment claims usually requires a deeper review.

What is the most common employment due-diligence gap?

A common gap is the absence of a reliable workforce inventory connecting contracts, payroll, working practice, disputes and employee data. Without that map, the buyer may not understand the liability it is assuming.

Can employment risks be addressed after closing?

Sometimes. The parties may agree a post-closing remediation plan, but urgent claims, missing permits, unlawful practices or risks affecting continuity may require action before closing or a specific contractual protection.

Should contractors be included in the review?

Yes. The factual relationship should be assessed where contractors perform work that resembles employment. The consequences may include reclassification, tax, social-security, employment and benefit exposure.

Does GDPR form part of employment due diligence?

Yes. The review should address employee and candidate data, particularly where monitoring, CCTV, HR software, health information or international transfers are involved. It should assess the GDPR and, where electronic or video monitoring is used, Article 5 of Law No. 190/2018, including necessity, proportionality, transparency, consultation, retention and any requirement for a DPIA.

What does the buyer receive at the end of the review?

The output may include a risk matrix, missing-document list, priority actions and drafting recommendations for warranties, indemnities, disclosure, conditions or post-closing measures.

Romanian lawyer reviewing employee and independent contractor arrangements with business clients

Employee vs Contractor in Romania: Legal Risks

Employee or independent contractor in Romania?

Foreign companies must match the contract to the way the work will actually be organised. Romanian employment and tax rules look beyond labels, invoices and foreign templates when control, integration and commercial independence point in another direction.

Individual Employment Labour Code Article 10 Subordination & Authority Mandatory Protections Payroll & Social Security ⚖ B2B Services Agreement Fiscal Code Article 7 4-of-7 Independence Test Commercial Autonomy Own Risk & Deliverables ✓ VS Romanian Substance-Over-Form Legal Review

A company cannot turn an employee into an independent contractor simply by changing the contract title. Romanian authorities and courts may examine how the relationship works in practice: who controls the schedule, location and method of work, whether the individual may serve other clients, who bears commercial risk and whose resources are used. Before engaging a Romanian contractor, foreign companies should test both the written terms and the operating model, document genuine independence and correct any inconsistent practices.

Hiring an individual in Romania requires an early classification decision. The company must determine whether it needs an employee working under its authority or an independent provider responsible for delivering agreed services through their own business activity.

This distinction affects much more than the contract label. It can determine employment protections, payroll and social-contribution treatment, working-time controls, termination requirements and the allocation of commercial risk. A foreign template describing someone as a “consultant” or “independent contractor” will not resolve those questions if the day-to-day relationship operates like employment.

Can the parties simply choose employee or contractor status?

No. The parties may choose a contractual structure, but that structure must match the legal and economic reality of the work. A services agreement cannot safely replace an employment contract where the individual is, in substance, working under the company’s authority and direction.

Romanian law approaches classification from more than one direction. The Romanian Labour Code defines an individual employment contract through work performed for and under the authority of an employer in return for remuneration. Separately, the Romanian Fiscal Code defines independent activity through a statutory set of criteria and allows the tax authorities to reclassify a transaction or activity so that its tax treatment reflects its economic substance.

The practical assessment therefore has two connected parts:

  1. Contractual structure: what rights, duties, control mechanisms and risks the documents create.
  2. Operational reality: how managers and the individual actually organise and perform the work.

Risk: A carefully drafted contractor agreement can still be undermined by daily instructions, fixed attendance, manager approval of absences, exclusivity, company-controlled tools or treatment identical to employees.

What is the practical difference between an employee and an independent contractor?

Decision factorEmployeeIndependent contractor
Legal relationshipPerforms work under an individual employment contract.Provides defined services under a civil or commercial agreement.
Direction and controlWorks for and under the authority of the employer.Controls the method and organisation of the service, subject to agreed deliverables.
Schedule and locationNormally follows contractual and employer-established working arrangements.Should have meaningful freedom to choose when, where and how the service is performed.
Commercial riskThe employer bears the business risk and owes the agreed salary.The provider assumes genuine risks linked to cost, performance and organisation.
Other clientsMay have other employment, subject to working-time, conflict and incompatibility rules.Should be free in substance to offer services to several clients.
Tools and resourcesWork is commonly performed with employer-provided systems and resources.The provider ordinarily uses or organises their own professional resources.
Statutory protectionsReceives the mandatory protections attached to employment status.Relies primarily on the services agreement and the law governing that agreement.
Ending the relationshipTermination must follow the applicable employment route and mandatory safeguards.Termination follows the contract and applicable civil or commercial rules.
Legal Matrix

The Workforce Classification Spectrum in Romania

Full Subordination • Mandatory daily working hours • Supervised work execution • Integrated into staff hierarchy ➔ Individual Employment (CIM) Gray / Misclassified Zone • Invoiced through PFA / SRL • But 100% exclusive dedication • Fixed salary-like retainers ⚠ High Reclassification Risk Commercial Autonomy • Freedom of place & schedule • Result/deliverable-based • Multi-client portfolio & risk ✓ Lawful B2B Contractor EMPLOYEE (CIM) SUBSTANCE OVER FORM INDEPENDENT (B2B)
Figure 1: The operational spectrum used by Romanian Labour & Tax authorities to assess workforce relationships.

No single row decides the classification. The correct conclusion depends on the relationship as a whole. For example, a contractor may need access to a client’s secure systems without becoming an employee. Conversely, issuing invoices through a registered business does not by itself prove independence if the individual remains subject to employee-like control.

What does Romanian employment law treat as employment?

The central employment indicator is subordination: the individual performs work for and under the authority of the employer in return for remuneration. The company’s control over the person, not merely its right to accept a deliverable, is particularly important.

Article 10 of the Labour Code defines the individual employment contract as the agreement under which an individual undertakes to perform work for and under the authority of an employer in exchange for remuneration. This is different from a genuine customer-provider relationship, where the customer specifies the expected result but does not manage the provider as part of its workforce.

Where the facts point to employment, our employment lawyers in Romania can review the proposed contract, workplace controls and onboarding documents before work begins.

For employment, the contract must be concluded in writing, in Romanian, no later than the day before the employee starts work. The employer must also complete the required employee-register formalities before work begins. The Romanian Labour Inspectorate confirms these requirements in its official employment-contract guidance.

Operational indicators that may point towards employment include:

  • a manager determines the individual’s daily or weekly schedule;
  • attendance at a company location or continuous online availability is mandatory;
  • the individual receives detailed instructions about how work must be performed;
  • absences require permission rather than coordination of deliverables;
  • performance is managed through the same hierarchy and procedures used for employees;
  • the individual is presented internally or externally as a member of staff;
  • the role is personal and the individual cannot use collaborators or substitutes;
  • the individual bears little or no genuine commercial risk.

These are indicators, not an automatic checklist. The nature of the work, regulatory requirements, information security and customer obligations may justify some controls. The question is whether those controls preserve an independent business relationship or place the individual under employer-like authority.

When does the Fiscal Code recognise an independent activity?

Under Article 7 of the Fiscal Code, an activity performed by an individual for income is independent when at least four of seven statutory criteria are met. The evidence should show that those criteria operate in practice, not only that they were copied into the contract.

Fiscal Code criterionPractical evidence to examine
1. Freedom over place, method and scheduleThe provider plans performance independently and is not assigned employee attendance hours.
2. Freedom to work for several clientsThe contract permits other clients and the operational model does not make that freedom artificial.
3. Assumption of inherent business riskThe provider bears relevant costs, rectification duties or other genuine performance risks.
4. Use of the individual’s own assetsThe provider uses or arranges professional equipment, software, workspace or other business resources where appropriate.
5. Use of intellectual or physical capacityThe service depends on the provider’s own professional expertise or performance.
6. Membership of a regulated professional bodyThe activity is carried out within a legally regulated profession, where applicable.
7. Freedom to perform directly, with staff or collaboratorsThe provider may lawfully organise delivery personally or through employees or collaborators, subject to justified qualification and confidentiality requirements.
Statutory Rule

Romanian Fiscal Code Article 7: The 4-of-7 Independence Test

1 Autonomy Place, method & schedule 2 Multiple Clients Substantive freedom to serve 3 Commercial Risk Inherent business risk borne 4 Own Assets / Tools Equipment, premises, licenses 5 Capacity & Skill Own professional expertise 6 Professional Body Regulated trade or guild 7 Criterion 7: Delegation & Substitutes Lawful freedom to perform directly or via staff/collaborators MINIMUM 4 REQUIRED to satisfy Fiscal Code Art. 7
Figure 2: The 7 statutory criteria under Romanian Fiscal Code Art. 7. At least 4 must be satisfied and backed by operational proof.

Practical tip: Build a short evidence file for each material contractor relationship. Keep the agreement, scope of work, invoices, deliverable records and evidence of independent organisation together. A clause is stronger when the working record supports it.

Are four fiscal criteria enough to eliminate employment risk?

Not necessarily. The four-of-seven test defines independent activity for Romanian tax purposes, but it should not be treated as permission to reproduce an employment relationship through a services contract.

The tax and employment analyses overlap, particularly around control, business risk and operational autonomy, but they do not perform exactly the same function. The Labour Code focuses on work performed under employer authority. The Fiscal Code focuses on the conditions for independent activity and the correct tax treatment of economic substance.

Article 11 of the Fiscal Code allows the tax authorities to disregard a transaction without economic purpose or reclassify the form of a transaction or activity to reflect its economic content. The authority must explain the relevant facts and evidence supporting the reclassification. This makes consistent documentation important, but it also means that documentation must reflect reality.

European Union case law follows a similar substance-based approach for EU-law concepts of “worker”. In Yodel Delivery Network, Case C-692/19, the Court of Justice explained that an “independent contractor” label does not prevent worker classification where independence is merely notional. Relevant considerations included control over time, place and content of work, exposure to commercial risk, integration into the undertaking and freedom to use substitutes or serve third parties.

Which arrangements create the highest misclassification risk?

Fixed employee-style availability

The contractor must work the company’s standard hours, remain continuously available and obtain approval for any absence, regardless of deliverables.

Control over method, not only result

A company manager allocates daily tasks, prescribes the precise working method and continuously supervises the individual in the same way as employees.

Artificial freedom to serve other clients

The agreement permits other clients, but workload, exclusivity expectations or availability requirements make that freedom unrealistic.

No meaningful business risk

The individual receives a fixed recurring amount, bears no relevant costs or correction obligations and is paid regardless of the agreed output.

Full integration into the organisation

The contractor has an internal job title, reports through the employee hierarchy, appears in staff structures and is evaluated under employee procedures.

A recurring monthly fee, a long relationship, one important client or use of a customer system is not automatically decisive. Each fact must be assessed in context. Risk rises when several employee-like elements combine and genuine commercial independence becomes difficult to demonstrate.

What can happen after a misclassification finding?

A misclassification finding can open separate tax, employment, social-contribution and contractual questions. The precise exposure depends on who makes the finding, the period reviewed, the parties involved and the evidence.

Tax and social-contribution exposure

The tax authority may reassess the economic substance of the activity and determine the related tax and contribution consequences. Historic treatment, payment records, filings and the allocation of responsibility between the parties must be reviewed before quantifying any exposure.

Employment rights and claims

An individual may argue that the factual relationship was employment and seek rights associated with employee status. Questions may arise concerning remuneration, working time, leave, termination, employee records and other mandatory protections. The outcome depends on the legal route and the evidence, not on the contract title alone.

Inspection and document risk

Where work has in substance been performed as employment without the required employment formalities, the company may face labour-inspection consequences. Specific sanctions should be assessed against the law in force and the facts at the date of the review.

Commercial and transaction risk

Misclassification can affect due diligence, financing, investment or an acquisition. A buyer may ask for the contractor population, templates, tax treatment, intellectual-property arrangements and potential historic liabilities to be reviewed before closing.

Intellectual property and confidentiality

The company should not assume that an employment-style intellectual-property position automatically applies to an independent provider. Ownership, assignment, permitted use, confidentiality and return or deletion of information should be dealt with expressly and consistently with the actual relationship.

Does contracting through a PFA or an SRL remove the risk?

No business form provides an automatic safe harbour. It may change the contractual and tax analysis, but the parties should still examine who performs the service, how the relationship operates and whether the structure has genuine commercial substance.

A Romanian authorised individual enterprise, commonly referred to as a PFA, is closely connected to the individual providing the activity. An SRL is a separate legal entity, which may employ staff, assume business risks and organise delivery through its own resources. Those differences matter, but neither registration document should replace a factual review.

If the supplier structure is still being established, the practical differences should also be considered alongside our guidance on company formation in Romania for foreign founders.

For an SRL supplier, examine whether the supplier is genuinely providing a business service or whether one individual is effectively inserted into the customer’s organisation under continuous personal control. For a PFA, test the statutory independence criteria directly and retain evidence supporting them.

Foreign companies should also avoid importing assumptions from their home jurisdiction. A worker physically performing activity in Romania may trigger Romanian employment, tax, social-security, registration or permanent-establishment questions. Those cross-border issues require a separate review based on the company, worker, location and duration of the arrangement.

Related structures may require a different analysis. Our guide to dual employment in Romania explains the rules applicable when an individual holds more than one employment contract, while the guide to service contract requirements in Romania covers the clauses and compliance points relevant to genuine service relationships.

Three illustrative classification scenarios

Scenario 1: project-based software specialist

A specialist agrees to deliver defined software modules, chooses the working schedule and location, uses their own business equipment, serves several clients and may use qualified collaborators. The customer controls security standards, acceptance criteria and deadlines but not the specialist’s daily organisation.

Assessment: These facts support independence, subject to the complete contract, tax position and actual implementation.

Scenario 2: “consultant” managed as staff

An individual works from 09:00 to 18:00, reports daily to a department manager, needs approval for time off, uses only company equipment, appears on the internal organisation chart and cannot accept other clients.

Assessment: The contractor label is difficult to reconcile with the operational indicators of subordination and workforce integration.

Scenario 3: regulated client environment

An external professional must work through the customer’s secure system and attend specific meetings because of regulatory and information-security requirements. The professional otherwise decides how to perform the mandate, bears professional risk and maintains other clients.

Assessment: Use of customer systems and scheduled coordination do not decide the issue alone. The purpose and extent of control must be examined.

These scenarios are illustrative. Changing one fact, such as exclusivity, substitution rights, commercial risk or management control, may change the conclusion.

How should a foreign company structure a genuine contractor relationship?

  1. Define the result. Describe services, deliverables, acceptance criteria and deadlines instead of creating an employee job description.
  2. Preserve operational autonomy. Allow the provider meaningful control over place, schedule and method, subject to justified security and coordination requirements.
  3. Address other clients. Avoid broad exclusivity unless a narrow restriction is genuinely necessary and legally supportable.
  4. Allocate business risk. Specify responsibility for costs, tools, corrections, professional organisation and non-conforming deliverables.
  5. Review substitution and collaboration. Permit lawful use of qualified personnel or collaborators where compatible with the service, confidentiality and regulatory requirements.
  6. Separate contractors from HR procedures. Do not automatically apply employee leave approval, performance management, benefits or disciplinary systems.
  7. Protect data, confidentiality and IP. Draft clauses that fit an independent services relationship and the actual information or assets involved.
  8. Keep evidence. Retain statements of work, invoices, deliverables and communications showing independent organisation.
  9. Reassess material changes. Review the classification when the scope, reporting line, exclusivity, workload or duration changes.

How can a company audit its existing Romanian contractors?

Audit Roadmap

7-Step Romanian Contractor Classification Audit

1 Inventory All PFA/SRL 2 Fact Map Daily routine 3 Fiscal Test 4-of-7 check 4 Labour Test Authority check 5 Risk Scan IP & Tax PE 6 Classify Risk tiers 7 Remediate Lawful fix Remediation must be prospective; avoid backdating documents or creating artificial records.
Figure 3: Corporate audit roadmap for evaluating contractor populations in Romania.
  1. Inventory every arrangement. Identify individuals engaged directly, through a PFA, through a personal SRL or through an intermediary.
  2. Map the facts. Record schedule, location, reporting, tools, clients, payment model, risk, substitution and integration.
  3. Test the seven fiscal criteria. Identify which criteria are genuinely met and what evidence supports each conclusion.
  4. Test employment subordination. Compare management practices against the Labour Code concept of work under employer authority.
  5. Check connected risks. Review tax, social security, immigration, permanent establishment, IP, confidentiality and data protection where relevant.
  6. Classify by risk. Separate clearly independent providers, fact-sensitive cases and arrangements that operate like employment.
  7. Implement a lawful correction plan. Amend terms and practices where the relationship remains genuinely independent, or move to an appropriate employment structure where the facts require it.

Risk: Do not “repair” the file by backdating documents or creating evidence that did not exist. Remediation should accurately record the current position and lawfully correct the arrangement going forward, while historic exposure is assessed separately.

The Bottom Line

The employee-versus-contractor decision must be made from the work model, not from the preferred invoice or contract label. Genuine contractors organise an independent activity, retain meaningful autonomy and assume real business responsibility. Employees perform work within the employer’s authority and receive the mandatory protections attached to that status.

For foreign companies, the safest starting point is a combined contract and operations review before the individual begins work. The same review should be repeated whenever the role becomes more integrated, exclusive or manager-controlled.

Frequently asked questions

Can a Romanian contractor work for only one client?

One client does not automatically create employment, but it weakens one of the express indicators of independent activity and may increase economic dependence. The full relationship must still be assessed, including control over schedule and method, commercial risk, tools, substitution rights and whether the contractor is integrated into the client’s organisation.

Is a monthly fixed fee evidence of employment?

Not by itself. A genuine provider may charge a monthly retainer or recurring service fee. Risk increases where the payment resembles a salary and is combined with fixed attendance, continuous personal availability, direct supervision, no deliverable risk and treatment identical to employees.

Can a foreign company hire a Romanian individual as a contractor?

Potentially, but the company should confirm that the activity is genuinely independent and that the contractor has an appropriate legal and tax setup. The arrangement may also raise Romanian tax, social-security, employment, registration or permanent-establishment questions depending on the company, work location and duration.

Does an SRL invoice eliminate misclassification risk?

No. An SRL is a separate legal entity and that distinction matters, but the customer should still examine whether it receives an independently organised business service or manages one individual as part of its workforce. Contracting structure, economic substance and daily practice must be assessed together.

Should the agreement use Romanian law?

The applicable law depends on the parties and cross-border structure. A foreign governing-law clause cannot necessarily remove mandatory rules relevant to work performed in Romania. The governing law, jurisdiction, tax position and mandatory employment protections should be reviewed together before using a foreign template.

When should an existing contractor arrangement be reviewed?

Review it when the contractor becomes exclusive, moves into a managerial reporting line, adopts employee working hours, receives company benefits, stops using independent resources or shifts from project delivery to an ongoing internal role. A periodic review is also appropriate for material or long-running engagements.

Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Classification depends on the contract, the actual working relationship, the parties’ tax status and the applicable Romanian and EU rules.

AI Notice: AI-assisted content, reviewed by a qualified Romanian lawyer.